Do You Still Pump Through Inspection Ports? Knock It Off!

This timesaving practice has been discredited many times, but we still hear about septic service technicians who go through the small hole to avoid the work of digging up a tank lid.
Do You Still Pump Through Inspection Ports? Knock It Off!
This photo received by Pumper magazine shows unidentified technicians pumping a tank through an inspection port. This photo was not published earlier. It is only being shown now to illustrate an ongoing issue with contractors accessing the tank through inspection ports. (File photo)

Interested in Education/Training?

Get Education/Training articles, news and videos right in your inbox! Sign up now.

Education/Training + Get Alerts

Is it standard practice to pump a septic tank through the inspection port?

Every so often I get jolted back to reality. This happened recently when I received an email with the question: Is it standard practice to pump a septic tank through the inspection port? Now, I know that I have addressed this issue before in this column, but apparently the message hasn’t been getting through to everyone.

I have always viewed this as an issue that doesn’t need review because “everyone knows and uses these standard practices.” But I am proven wrong again, and at the risk of “preaching to the choir,” I will spend some time and space on this issue again.

The simple and straightforward answer to the question is that it is not a recognized standard practice and should not be done! In fact, it can be a detrimental practice and result in harm to the tank and the system as whole.


It was particularly distressing to me to learn, upon further discussion with the individual posing the question, that it is a practice seen continually and often. It is a question that I thought had been put to rest 25 to 30 years ago and that we as an industry had moved well beyond this activity.

When I started working in the industry — and in discussion with pumpers and service providers — this question was a topic where there was disagreement. One set of pumpers said in no way is it a good practice because the tank does not actually get cleaned, while another group swore up and down that they could clean a tank through the 4-inch inspection ports by backflushing. Not a problem, they argued. Fortunately, I worked with some university colleagues and pumpers that recognized the disagreement and sought to learn what really happens when you pump through an inspection port.

We rode along with pumpers going to jobs and observed the tank pumping. In the cases where pumpers used the inspection ports and said the tank was clean, we gained access through a manhole and found the tanks were not cleaned of solids. What pumping through the inspection port accomplished was primarily the removal of water, leaving behind the majority of scum and sludge.

As we shared this information nationally at conferences and trade shows, we found our experience was not unique, and others around the country were making the same observations. This led to most state wastewater associations adopting practice standards that called for tanks to be pumped only through the manhole access for each tank, or in the case of multiple-compartment tanks, each compartment.

In a number of those states (mine included), this standard was adopted as part of the state rules and regulations. Any technician who pumps the tank through the inspection port is violating state regulations and is subject to a fine and/or the loss of their license to pump.


However, violating the rule is not the reason why the practice should stop. The reason is that not adequately cleaning the tank puts the rest of the treatment system at risk — particularly the most expensive part of the system, the soil treatment unit. As solids build up in the tank, they can be moved out of the tank into the soil treatment and dispersal area, reducing the ability of soil to accept the effluent leaving the tank. This results in failure of the soil treatment area and surfacing of effluent or backing up into the residence. Both present significant health and environmental risks. In addition, fixing or replacing a failed drainfield or mound system is expensive for the homeowner.

Most states now require effluent screens at the outlet of septic tanks to prevent larger solids from moving to the soil treatment area. This is a good thing because when the tank is not adequately cleaned, hopefully the filter plugs before the soil treatment area is damaged. This is no substitute for cleaning the tank. After paying several times for cleaning the effluent screen, the homeowner often figures out that if the filter isn’t there, the tank does not back up and the filter gets removed to the garage. Then we are right back where we started, putting the soil treatment area at risk.

Pumping through the inspection port hurts the homeowner who has to bear the cost of replacing the soil treatment area. But our entire industry also suffers because when the system fails due to not following accepted standards, the homeowner says to their neighbors — and more importantly to the unit of local government — “those decentralized systems (septic) do not work! And we need to have a municipal sewer system!”

I believe most people reading this already pump through the manhole access, and this is nothing new. But it is incumbent on all of us to educate people in the industry and homeowners about the risks and problems associated with pumping through inspection ports. I would suggest you contact your local media outlets — newspaper, radio, Facebook groups — and share information about proper septic service techniques. Hopefully homeowners will see this information and will no longer accept (pay for) an inadequate job of pumping.


Comments on this site are submitted by users and are not endorsed by nor do they reflect the views or opinions of COLE Publishing, Inc. Comments are moderated before being posted.