Combating Objections to Hearing Protection

This content is sponsored by Sonetics. Sponsored content is authorized by the client and does not necessarily reflect the views of COLE Publishing. View our privacy policy.
Combating Objections to Hearing Protection

Interested in Trucks?

Get Trucks articles, news and videos right in your inbox! Sign up now.

Trucks + Get Alerts

Sonetics recently received a comment through one of our social media channels that surprised me. In reference to the article about occupational noise, “Of Mind, Body and High Noise Exposure,” a commenter wrote: “Just block it out. No problem.” 

He’s partially right. You can train yourself to ignore noise. But there is a problem. Just because you can mentally block it out doesn’t prevent physical harm. I cover the reasons in the article, but the comment illustrates why occupational noise is such a danger.

Common objections to hearing protection

Long-term exposure to occupational noise sneaks up on workers. Because hearing loss can be so gradual, by the time workers notice that their hearing has worsened, it’s too late. Hearing protection is not retroactive. You can prevent future damage, but not what’s already occurred.

The objection of, “I don’t need hearing protection because I’m used to loud noise,” may be the most dangerous. That’s like believing that if the human body is submerged long enough the lungs will adapt and be able to breathe under water. It’s physically impossible for hearing organs to “get used to” noise. It may not cause pain any longer due to previous hearing damage, but loud noise is not like high altitude. Our bodies cannot get used to it.

See if any of these common objections to wearing traditional hearing protection sound familiar:

  • “I can’t hear my coworkers, warnings, alarms or equipment.”
  • “Hearing protection is too uncomfortable in/over my ears for an entire shift.”
  • “Foam earplugs are gross after a few hours, and earmuffs make my ears sweat too much.”
  • “Hearing protection doesn’t fit with my other PPE devices like hardhats and safety glasses.”
  • “My hearing can’t get worse.” 

When matched against the biological damage from occupational noise, none of these objections are valid.

How loud is too loud?

According to OSHA, if exposed to 85 decibels for eight or more hours in a shift, then workers are required to wear hearing protection. Not sure how loud your environment is? Take an informal measurement with a free noise meter app such as Decibel X. As a general rule, any environment where workers 3 feet apart have to consistently ask each other to repeat instructions calls for hearing protection.


A solution for occupational noise exposure

Even though their objections to wearing hearing protection against occupational noise don’t hold water, you still want to make workers as comfortable as possible. If you’re going to mandate hearing protection, then view it as an opportunity to improve communication and increase production while strengthening safety.

One way to constructively overcome objections is through team communication systems featuring wireless headsets, active hearing protection and listen-through technology to optimize situational awareness. These solutions include hearing protection as one of many features. They also make it more difficult for workers to refuse wearing them. They can only do so by consciously choosing to remove themselves from team conversations, which would leave them unable to safely or efficiently perform their duties.

Learn more at sonetics.com.



Discussion

Comments on this site are submitted by users and are not endorsed by nor do they reflect the views or opinions of COLE Publishing, Inc. Comments are moderated before being posted.